I went to see the movie, “Looper” the other day, and I will
say that movies and other narratives that deal with the aspects of Time and
Time travel are amongst my favorite. Need I say that I am a freakishly ardent
fan of Dr. Who? (Tom Baker, Jon Pertwee,
and Matt Smith at least)
I am not sure what planted the seed, though I suspect that
it was the original “Cave of Time” series that I began reading in elementary
school. No, in fact, writing that last sentence, I know that it was. That, and
Mrs. Whitworth reading Madelaine L’Engle’s A
Wrinkle in Time to us in the 5th grade. Between those two
events, I was forever stuck in a time-warped sense of reality. That is not to
blame, by any stretch of the imagination, and my imagination was stretched by
those books and has been ever sense—beyond many imaginations out there—but
merely to trace the roots of this.
A Wrinkle in Time
is celebrating its 50th anniversary this year and I just purchased a
copy for my friend’s 11-year old daughter, so I will be curious to see how it
has stood the test of “time” in some regards. I just remembered being
mesmerized by every chapter that unfolded before us as Mrs. W. read them,
always leaving off a critical moment, leaving us to hang out there in Space.
Though, the flipside was that because of the genius 5-year old Charles Wallace
protagonist, she would always say, “even a 5-year old could do this…” much to
our chagrin and dismay if we could not perform such feats of genius, though she
challenged us like no other, and if you rose to the challenge, you were
rewarded with rare praise. And, as you may know, rare praise is cherished oh so
much more than mere flippant everyday praise.
Don’t get me wrong, I give positive feedback, encouragement
and loving support daily to my daughter, but I make a distinction when she
really does something special, and she knows it. And, there is no substitute
for the beaming of your child’s face when she does something awesome and you
acknowledge it. As a proud father, EVERYTHING my little girl does is worthy of
praise, but I do know how to single out the really “super-cool” things too.
But, back to Time.
When I saw “Looper” I was very impressed, and as for “Time”
movies, it is hard to impress me as I usually see the “loop-hole” in the plot
or logic of the time travel as there always is one at some level. Although I
saw a couple in this one, for the most part, it was pretty well done. The
attention to detail such as the bandage on the ear and the missing piece of the
older version of Joe was excellent.
However, there was one sentence that stuck out for me, oddly
enough. It was the scene when Old Joe meets Young Joe face-to-face in the
diner. Old Joe remarks how odd it is to look at Young Joe. Young Joe says,
“your face is backwards…” or something like that.
Hmmm…I saw that in the previews and it meant nothing to me.
When the line was delivered in the movie, it was interesting, but I did not
really let it sink in.
Then, later, when I saw a picture of myself that my friend
had posted online and thought of that as compared to what I see daily in the
mirror, it did hit me. I know that this is no great revelation, but it is
actually if you really, really think about it.
In the mirror, my rather prominent scar on my forehead
appears to be on the right side of my forehead. In pictures, and to everyone
who sees me in real life, it is on the left side of my forehead. For 30 years,
I have become accustomed to seeing this scar on my right side. However, were I
to meet myself, in the Future or the Past (or at least after I received the
scar, of course), I would see it for the first time in person on the LEFT side!
Then it hit me.
How many times do people say, when they see a picture of
themselves, “that doesn’t look like me!” Well, it DOESN’T. Because, what you
see of yourself in the mirror is not what the picture shows. Nor is it what
everyone else sees, so, no it does not look like “you” because “you” have been
looking at a different “you” than everyone else.
So, what if you came face to face with “you”?
How would “you” view “you”? As a familiar from the mirror,
falsely represented, or as a stranger, for the first Time?
That simple scene, very necessary in the movie’s trajectory,
set off many thoughts in my mind when I was processing it later that evening.
Much of my philosophy is based upon the Socratic/Delphic motto of “Know
Thyself,” but in a flash, I realized that the “Thyself” that I have known in
the mirror each day was not really “me”!
Jacques Lacan is well known for many things, but one of them
is the importance of the “mirror phase” in which an infant finally recognizes
his/her image in a mirror and thus gains a sense of “self” with respect to the
“world order.” Well, that vision of the “self” is incorrect. It is distorted
and well, simply put, an illusion. Lacan was brilliant, however, I’m not sure
he took this into account (please correct me if I am wrong and missed something
in his lectures). The mirror stage is merely furthering deception, not
revelation, nor awareness on the visceral level.
So, where does that leave us with “know-ing Thy-self” and the “mirror stage” as a crucial philosophy or
turning point in development if both of them are based upon a fallacy of
perception?
Suddenly, I feel out of the loop…
No comments:
Post a Comment